ZAMG/OE votes in favour of the Armenian network.
It might make sense to encourage them and similar institutions to provide data from more than one stations. Do you know the reason for them to only provide one station?
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 20.08.2021 um 23:10 schrieb Michelle Grobbelaar (via FDSN) <fdsn-representatives-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org>:
I have received another request for membership from the National Survey for Seismic Protection in Armenia.
A short description of the seismic network of the National Survey of Seismic Protection is following:
• 6 High performance, compact, medium-motion broadband 6TD seismometers;
• 6 High performance, low noise, compact, broadband 3T seismometers;
• 6 High performance, low noise, compact, broadband 5T accelerometers;
• 1 broad-band STS2;
• 1 Nanometrics Broadband Sensor Trillium 240, Streckeisen STS-1VBB w/E300, Kinemetrics FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer.
The real time-based data are distributed to Data Centre from the seismic network stations
They are ready to share data from at least one station (SRTK (41.06618, 44.32206) station).
Please could you send me your votes by the start of the IASPEI GA on 21 August 2021.
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-representatives/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-representatives-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.