Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
5 FDSN member votes.Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is
Best,
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,Best,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1 [1]]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Dear WG2 members,--
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
5 FDSN member votes.Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is
Best,
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,--
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
On 2020. Nov 17., at 16:49, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
On 17 Nov 2020, at 17:49, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
On Nov 17, 2020, at 8:49 AM, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH__;!!Mih3wA!S6wpqkXwrW6OSLqzZ_j5JrpuC2vF1bWMGlzwaO9oyTze89ri3sh5571vaOFjT8c$
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/__;!!Mih3wA!S6wpqkXwrW6OSLqzZ_j5JrpuC2vF1bWMGlzwaO9oyTze89ri3sh5571vZk-b_Oc$
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/__;!!Mih3wA!S6wpqkXwrW6OSLqzZ_j5JrpuC2vF1bWMGlzwaO9oyTze89ri3sh5571vkg7ZY5c$ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/__;!!Mih3wA!S6wpqkXwrW6OSLqzZ_j5JrpuC2vF1bWMGlzwaO9oyTze89ri3sh5571vl6BOdIA$ )
Update subscription preferences at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/__;!!Mih3wA!S6wpqkXwrW6OSLqzZ_j5JrpuC2vF1bWMGlzwaO9oyTze89ri3sh5571vemElBko$
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
5 FDSN member votes.Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is
Best,
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,--
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Il giorno 17 nov 2020, alle ore 17:49, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> ha scritto:
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
On 17. Nov 2020, at 17:49, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:--
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
5 FDSN member votes.Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is
Best,
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
On 17 Nov 2020, at 17:49, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
--
Javier Quinteros
FDSN WG2 Chair
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre) Votes are
agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
Dear WG2 members,--
Two weeks ago I sent a message with the result of the Evaluation of the
IRIS proposal for a new "FDSN Source Identifier schema" [1]. The idea
was to give the chance to receive the last comments before voting.
Today, we formally open the voting phase to decide on the adoption of
this new Identifier schema.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can.
Please, *register your vote by December 1st 2020*
Let me remind you that the Review Team has already sent a recommendation
(see link below) and the decision was that
"The review committee recommends approval of the specification as revised."
https://nextcloud.gfz-potsdam.de/s/tpAEr7bHXRAJetH
This proposal went through an open discussion in the first semester of
2019 in order to clarify objectives and receive feedback from the
members. After that, it was made available again for comments on May
2020. During both discussion phases the proposal was well received by
the community and, despite that the discussion was kept open for some
time, it was good to see that most of the opinions considered it a
proper approach to deal with the limitations of the current naming scheme.
Best,Voting rules (consistent with current FDSN Terms of Reference):
1 vote per FDSN member (i.e. each network or datacentre)
Votes are agreed with at least 2/3 majority. Quorum for any decision is 5 FDSN member votes.
[1] http://docs.fdsn.org/projects/source-identifiers/en/v1.0/
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/