Begin forwarded message:
Date: February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
From: Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu>
To: Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Subject: FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service specification regarding fdsnws-station text output
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch between the "template" and example for station-level text output from the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template. The original intention was to include the SiteName column as illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b" and describe the modification in the Changes section of the document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName | StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
On Feb 23, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu> wrote:================
Dear FDSN WG members. (I believe this relates to both WGII and WGIII so I am sending it to both lists)
Please study this recommendation coming from our colleagues in France with a specific recommendation from Chad Trabant from IRIS that addresses this shortcoming.
Please respond if you agree or disagree with the proposed recommendation by March 13 and be sure to include Gale Cox who will tally the responses.
Cheers
Dr. Tim Ahern
tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Chair of FDSN WG III on
Products, Tools and Services
Begin forwarded message:_______________________________________________
Date: February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
From: Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu <chad<at>iris.washington.edu>>
To: Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>>
Subject: FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service specification regarding fdsnws-station text output
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch between the "template" and example for station-level text output from the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template. The original intention was to include the SiteName column as illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b" and describe the modification in the Changes section of the document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName | StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
fdsn-wg2-data mailing list
fdsn-wg2-data<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/fdsn-wg2-data
Dear FDSN WG members. (I believe this relates to both WGII and WGIII so I am sending it to both lists)
Please study this recommendation coming from our colleagues in France with a specific recommendation from Chad Trabant from IRIS that addresses this shortcoming.
Please respond if you agree or disagree with the proposed recommendation by March 13 and be sure to include Gale Cox who will tally the responses.
Cheers
Dr. Tim Ahern
tim<at>iris.washington.edu
Chair of FDSN WG III on
Products, Tools and Services
Begin forwarded message:_______________________________________________
Date: February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
From: Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu>
To: Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Subject: FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service specification regarding fdsnws-station text output
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch between the "template" and example for station-level text output from the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template. The original intention was to include the SiteName column as illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b" and describe the modification in the Changes section of the document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName | StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
fdsn-wg3-products mailing list
fdsn-wg3-products<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/fdsn-wg3-products
Dear FDSN WG members. (I believe this relates to both WGII and WGIII--
so I am sending it to both lists)
Please study this recommendation coming from our colleagues in France
with a specific recommendation from Chad Trabant from IRIS that
addresses this shortcoming.
Please respond if you agree or disagree with the proposed
recommendation by *March 13* and be sure to include Gale Cox who will
tally the responses.
Cheers
Dr. Tim Ahern
tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Chair of FDSN WG III on
Products, Tools and Services
Begin forwarded message:_______________________________________________
*Date: *February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
*From: *Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu
<chad<at>iris.washington.edu>>
*To: *Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu
<tim<at>iris.washington.edu>>
*Subject: **FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service
specification regarding fdsnws-station text output*
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web
Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch
between the "template" and example for station-level text output from
the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains
an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template.
The original intention was to include the SiteName column as
illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose
the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the
specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on
page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b"
and describe the modification in the Changes section of the
document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a
majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and
would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
FDSN-WS-Specifications-1.1
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName |
StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
fdsn-wg3-products mailing list
fdsn-wg3-products<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/fdsn-wg3-products
Dear FDSN WG members. (I believe this relates to both WGII and WGIII
so I am sending it to both lists)
Please study this recommendation coming from our colleagues in France
with a specific recommendation from Chad Trabant from IRIS that
addresses this shortcoming.
Please respond if you agree or disagree with the proposed
recommendation by *March 13*and be sure to include Gale Cox who will
tally the responses.
Cheers
Dr. Tim Ahern
tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Chair of FDSN WG III on
Products, Tools and Services
Begin forwarded message:_______________________________________________
*Date: *February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
*From: *Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu
<chad<at>iris.washington.edu>>
*To: *Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu
<tim<at>iris.washington.edu>>
*Subject: **FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service
specification regarding fdsnws-station text output*
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web
Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch
between the "template" and example for station-level text output from
the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains
an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template.
The original intention was to include the SiteName column as
illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose
the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the
specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on
page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b"
and describe the modification in the Changes section of the
document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a
majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and
would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
FDSN-WS-Specifications-1.1
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName |
StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
fdsn-wg2-data mailing list
fdsn-wg2-data<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/fdsn-wg2-data
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Date: February 23, 2015 at 11:04:13 AM PST
To: "fdsn-wg3-products<at>iris.washington.edu III-Products" <fdsn-wg3-products<at>iris.washington.edu>, "fdsn-wg2-data<at>iris.washington.edu II-Data" <fdsn-wg2-data<at>iris.washington.edu>, Gale Cox <gale<at>iris.washington.edu>
Subject: [fdsn-wg2-data] ACTION REQUIRED: FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service specification regarding fdsnws-station text output
Dear FDSN WG members. (I believe this relates to both WGII and WGIII so I am sending it to both lists)
Please study this recommendation coming from our colleagues in France with a specific recommendation from Chad Trabant from IRIS that addresses this shortcoming.
Please respond if you agree or disagree with the proposed recommendation by March 13 and be sure to include Gale Cox who will tally the responses.
Cheers
Dr. Tim Ahern
tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>
Chair of FDSN WG III on
Products, Tools and Services
Begin forwarded message:_______________________________________________
Date: February 13, 2015 at 4:42:36 PM PST
From: Chad Trabant <chad<at>iris.washington.edu <chad<at>iris.washington.edu>>
To: Tim Ahern <tim<at>iris.washington.edu <tim<at>iris.washington.edu>>
Subject: FDSN WG III proposal for small edit to the web service specification regarding fdsnws-station text output
Hi Tim,
The Grenoble group has identified an inconsistency in the FDSN Web Services specification. The issue is that there is a mismatch between the "template" and example for station-level text output from the fdsnws-station specification. Specifically the example contains an extra field for "SiteName" that is not included in the template. The original intention was to include the SiteName column as illustrated by the example.
To resolve this inconsistency and avoid future confusion I propose the following:
a) Modify the station-level text "template" on page 12 of the specification to include a SiteName column matching the example on page 13.
b) Internally change the specification version from "1.1 to "1.1b" and describe the modification in the Changes section of the document. The file name and URL to the specification will not change.
The IRIS service and services based on SeisComP, representing a majority of FDSN WS implementations, include the SiteName column and would not be effected by this change.
Please forward to the Working Group as needed.
Chad
Current station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|StartTime|EndTime
...
Current station-level example:
#Network | Station | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | SiteName | StartTime | EndTime
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1989-08-29T00:00:00|1995-07-14T00:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9459|-106.4572|1850.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|1995-07-14T00:00:00|2000-10-19T16:00:00
IU|ANMO|34.9502|-106.4602|1839.0|Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA|2000-10-19T16:00:00|2002-11-19T21:07:00
Proposed new station-level template:
level=station
Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime Network|Station|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|SiteName|StartTime|EndTime
...
Note new "SiteName" column.
fdsn-wg2-data mailing list
fdsn-wg2-data<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/fdsn-wg2-data